đ° The Pulse of Janesville and Rock County â Hypothetically Speaking August 8, 2025, | Vol. 1, Issue 23(Approx. 1971 words â a ten –minute read)
Whatâs Ahead? A Civic Reckoning and back to basics⌠Kindergarten Rules, Free Speech, and the Public Behavior Crisis, an update from the newsmakers and more.
đ§ Commentary
We are in a Behavioral Crisis Disguised as a Political One
â It is not just who we vote for. It is how we behave while doing it. â
There is a lot wrong with the way public engagement is showing up latelyâand not all of it is ideological.
The real fracture line in civic life? Behavior.
Violence masquerading as protest. Vitriol posing as free speech. Manufactured outrage where thoughtful dialogue used to live.
Somewhere along the way, we traded in âuse kind wordsâ for âwhose voice can hit hardest.â But the truth is still:
Everything I need to thrive I learned in kindergarten.
Share your crayons. Say sorry. Take turns. Clean up your mess.
If our democratic habits do not include these foundations, we are not just losing civilityâwe are losing legitimacy.
đ˘ Freedom Is Not Free When It is Weaponized
Let us be clear:
- Free speech does not include punching someone in the nose.
- Party labels are immaterial if you cannot behave like a civil, functioning adult.
- âGet a dog if you want a friend in Washingtonâ is not just a jokeâit is a warning.
Today, we supply mourners for funerals, wailers for political events, and anarchists for chaos. But where are the civic stewards? The bridge-builders? The people who can speak truth without tearing down the house?
We call it deliberative democracy. But demonstration without deliberation is just noise.
đ¨ For you to ponder:
What is your take on âdeliberative democracyâ?
When does it become generative, and when does it cross the line into destructive?
đď¸ A Call to Rebuild the Civic Square
This is not a lament. It is a call to construct.
We need spaces where ethical leadership, participatory governance, and inclusive dialogue are modeledânot mocked.
đ ď¸ What Comes Next: A Policy Agenda for Civic Renewal
We cannot rebuild community trust with sentiment alone.
We need infrastructure: Policy. Programs. People.
đ§Ş Participatory Democracy Labs
- Structured forums for civil discourse and community problem-solving
- Youth-led and intergenerational by design
- Synchronized with local decision-making cycles.
đ Ethics-in-Leadership Public Curriculum
- Taught in schools, colleges, and civic groups.
- Topics: transparency, governance, and public ethics
- Includes mentorship, storytelling, and systems-thinking.
đ Public Accountability Scorecards
- Nonpartisan indicators for responsiveness, inclusion, and transparency
- Made public via civic dashboards run by media collaboratives.
đď¸ Civic Media Ecosystems
- Community-driven platforms elevating underrepresented voices.
- Produced with students, artists, and journalists.
- Reframes storytelling as a civic tool.
đ¨ Hypothetically Speaking
Imagine a community forum designed with dignity and dialogue at the center.
What would it look like? Who would be there?
How do we buildânot just disrupt?
đď¸ Development Watch | Civic Futures Weekly
GM/JATCO Advisory Board: Vision, Voice, and Vigilance
– Janesville City Council — As Janesville prepares to take its next step in the redevelopment of the former GM/JATCO site, the City Managerâs office has announced a revised timeline and framework for setting up a citizen advisory board. The resolution, outlined in a memorandum to Council, rescheduled Council consideration to August 25.

The memorandum states that the proposal reflects ongoing input from Council leadership and community stakeholders. Itâs a promising gesture, but one that deserves close scrutiny.
This proposal arrives in the shadow of Councilmember Erdmanâs earlier advisory board concept, which emphasized deeper representation, broader community engagement, and a more transparent selection process. That proposal was dismissed by the Council majority. Now, with the latest version on the table, the question is: how does it compare and what must be in place to ensure this City delivers on its promise?
đ§ Comparing the Vision: Erdman vs. Executive Proposal
Councilmember Erdmanâs proposal prioritized:
- Inclusive representation, especially from impacted neighborhoods
- Transparent selection, potentially via the Advisory Committee on Appointments
- Clear public engagement mandates, with community-driven input baked into the boardâs charge
- Checks and balances, to ensure the boardâs independence from executive influence.
The new proposal, while incorporating some of these elements, leans more heavily on executive coordination. It includes:
- A lean board structure for âagilityâ
- Councilmember nominations post-resolution approval
- A consultant-led planning process via RFP
- A structured timeline for engagement and concept development
While the intent to collaborate is clear, the mechanisms for accountability and representation remain under-defined.
â Critical Must-Haves for a Legitimate Advisory Board
To ensure this board is not merely symbolic, several foundational elements must be present:
1. Transparent Selection Process
Councilmember nominations are a start, but without a formal vetting mechanism, the process risks becoming political rather than participatory. Consider using the Advisory Committee on Appointments or another neutral screening panel.
2. Neighborhood Representation
The board must include residents from the immediate GM/JATCO area. Redevelopment without proximity-based input is a recipe for disconnect.
3. Defined Scope and Authority
What decisions can the board influence? What is advisory versus binding? Clarity here will prevent confusion and ensure meaningful contribution.
4. Public Participation Infrastructure
A robust engagement planâworkshops, surveys, listening sessionsâmust be embedded, not optional. Community voice should shape every phase.
5. Staff and Consultant Support
Board members must be equipped with data, facilitation, and technical expertise. Without it, even the best intentions falter.
â ď¸ Cautionary Areas Requiring Monitoring
1. Executive Overreach
If the board becomes a vehicle to confirm pre-existing plans rather than co-create new ones, its credibility will erode.
2. Tokenism in Representation
Diversity must be authentic, not performative. Whoâs at the table matters, but how theyâre empowered matters more.
3. Timeline Rigidity
While the proposed schedule is thoughtful, flexibility must remain. Community input may demand more time, and consultants should not dictate pace over substance.
4. Lack of Council Ownership
If Council voices are sidelined in shaping the board, the process risks losing democratic legitimacy. Council must remain engaged throughout.
Hypothetically Speaking:
Imagine a redevelopment process where the advisory board isnât just a checkboxâbut a civic engine. Where residents shape not only the look of the site, but its purpose. Where transparency isnât a press releaseâitâs a practice.
Hypothetically speaking, what if this board became a model for future city planningâone rooted in trust, shared power, and long-term vision?
Thatâs not simply good governance. Thatâs good faith.
As the August 25 vote approaches, letâs stay focused on what matters: representation, accountability, and community ownership. The GM/JATCO site deserves more than developmentâit deserves democracy.
——————————————–
đť Rethinking Concessions and Civic Partnership at the Janesville Ice Arena
Janesville City Council: In a quiet but meaningful shift, the City of Janesville and Wisconsin Hockey Partners (WHP) are updating their longstanding agreement to better reflect operational realities and legal compliance, especially around alcohol sales and community engagement.
Under the proposed amendment, the Cityâs designated concessionaire, Sports Facilities Food and Beverage Wisconsin, LLC, will take over as the official alcohol license holder for the Ice Arena. This change removes the City from direct responsibility for alcohol-related activities, aligning with state law and simplifying oversight. WHP, meanwhile, will continue to provide licensed volunteer bartenders to support responsible alcohol service during their events. This is a model that blends civic participation with practical staffing.

But the heart of this amendment lies in a new sponsorship structure. Rather than tying revenue to alcohol consumption, the City will now compensate WHP based on attendance. For every scanned ticket at WHP games, the organization will receive $1.46âan amount derived from estimated concession revenue and projected attendance. This shift is expected to generate approximately $41,000 annually for WHP, with adjustments made each year based on the Consumer Price Index. If attendance surpasses 28,000 for NAHL games, WHP may also receive an additional end-of-season sponsorship bonus.
The amendment also formalizes WHPâs responsibility to staff beer outlets with volunteers. If theyâre unable to do so, theyâll reimburse the City for the staffing shortfallâan accountability measure that reinforces the collaborative nature of the partnership.
On the advertising front, the City will now receive 15% of all advertising revenue that exceeds $350,000. However, questions remain about the types and limits of advertising permitted under the agreement. Rumors of City-imposed restrictions have circulated, but the amendment offers no clarity on this pointâleaving room for further dialogue and transparency.
Ultimately, this proposal reflects a necessary recalibration of roles and responsibilities. Itâs designed to be revenue-neutral for both parties, while reinforcing the shared goal of fostering a vibrant, community-centered sports venue. More than just a financial arrangement, itâs a model of how civic institutions and local organizations can co-create value.
—————————————————
đŁ Civic Futures Weekly
When Technology Meets IntegrityâAnd Civic Learning Comes Alive
đŤ Janesville School District
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to ripple through our classrooms, boardrooms, and communities, most districts are reacting.
But Janesville is leading.
When the Board of Education meets this week, they are not just reviewing another tech policy. They are weighing a civic frameworkâone built on values, vision, and democratic resolve.
This is not just a policy. It is a public commitment to integrity.
Where others scramble, Janesville reframes the question:
â Not âHow do we control AI?â
But âHow do we guide it with ethical intent?â â
Key Highlights:
- Transparency, academic honesty, and digital equity are the bedrock.
- Students are not passive usersâthey are stewards of AI.
- Educators are facilitators of thoughtful integrationânot compliance officers.
Statewide, it supports DPIâs guidance. Nationally, it reflects broader ethical movements. Locally, it is grounded and intentional.
This is not just about software.
It is about soul.
đ§ Civic Learning in Motion: The Milton Model
Across Rock County, Milton School District is launching a transformative year-long Civic Practicum in collaboration with the Rock County Civics Academy.
Students will not just study systemsâthey will shape them.
Features:
- Community-based research
- Media storytelling
- Ethical leadership labs
Each student is matched with a mentorâfrom artists to educators to nonprofit leaders. These relationships model purpose-driven civic engagement.
As students facilitate forums, produce community narratives, and present insights to local leaders, they rehearse democracy in real time.
This is not just education.
It is civic rehearsal.
đ¨ Hypothetically Speaking
What if every district followed Janesvilleâs lead on ethics?
What if every classroom embraced Miltonâs model of agency?
What if civic learning was not an add-onâbut the heartbeat?
If these models hold, our civic future will not be inherited.
It will be constructedâby those most prepared to lead it.
â¤ď¸ Two Events, One Truth
A personal note:
In the past two weeks, I experienced both rupture and rebirth.
đĽ A town hall meeting so hostile it felt like a death rattle for democratic engagement.
đŠ The birth of twins in my familyâa moment full of vulnerability, hope, and promise.
These moments collided in me.
The town hall reminded me of what we risk becoming.
The birth reminded me of what we are fighting for.
And the question echoes:
â What are we building for the next generation? â
âď¸ Urgency Meets Opportunity
Yes, there is fearâthat dysfunction is systemic.
But there is also hopeâthat we are ready to rise.
We must reclaim space for dialogue.
We must elevate what is good and decent.
We must build better systems.
Because the next era will not be decided by headlines.
It will be shaped by the spaces we create the voices we elevate, and the courage we
show.

đ¨ Final Word: Hypothetically Speaking
Let us raise the standard for public engagement.
Let us insist our democracy be both demonstrative and dignified.
Let us bring civility backânot as politeness, but as courage.
This week, make your point.
Speak up.
Do it with honor.
Do it with intention.
Do it with the civics you learned in kindergarten and the vision you hold for the next generation.
Because the democracy we build todayâŚ
is the legacy they inherit tomorrow.
â RHG
Subscribe to Hypothetically Speaking for insight at the intersection of policy, people, and possibility.
New columns every Friday from Wisconsinâs heartland to Americaâs horizon.
â Community Spotlight: Havana Coffee
Fueling Dialogue, One Cup at a Time
Looking for a space to connect and reflect? Visit Havana Coffee at 1250 Milton Avenue true Janesville gem where civic energy meets excellent espresso. With hearty food, warm service, and a strong commitment to local journalism, Havana Coffee proudly supports the Rock County Civics Academy and all who believe in informed engagement.
đŹ A Call to Leadership
Every advancement in our community begins with someone choosing to act. If you have asked yourself when the right time to get involved isâthe answer might just be now.
Ways to contribute:
⢠Volunteer with a civic group
⢠Apply to serve on a local board or commission
⢠Run for public office and lead the change.
âIf not me, who? If not now, when? â Hillel the Elder
Welcome our newest sponsor, Nowlan Law Firm and Attorney Tim Lindau. Thank you for sharing our vision for the future with your support today.
We deeply appreciate the support and encouragement from Tim at Nowlan, Daniela at Havana and many others who ask with us:
đ Hypothetically SpeakingâŚ
- What if transparency was standard in local government?
- What if civic engagement became Rock Countyâs defining strength?
That is the mission of Hypothetically Speaking. And with your voice in the mix, it is closer to reality than ever.
————————-
đ Stay Engaged with the Rock County Civics Academy
đ [Visit Our Website] rockcountycivicsacademy.org
đ [Follow us on Facebook]
đş [Subscribe on YouTube]
đ° [Join Our Substack Newsletter] Substack.com Key words: Rock County Civics Academy
Until next timeâstay curious, stay engaged, and stay connected.
Š2025 Rock County Civics Academy â All Rights Reserved.
No responses yet